Blue Books as a Solution to the ChatGPT Cheating Debate

Abstract: The use of chatGPT and other automated writing tools has sparked a debate on cheating in academia. This paper proposes the reintroduction of Blue Books as a solution to this issue. Blue Books, traditionally used for handwritten exams, can also be employed for assignments requiring critical thinking and writing skills. By assigning Blue Book tasks, instructors can ensure that students are truly learning and internalizing the principles of good writing, similar to how math education emphasizes the understanding of core principles before introducing calculators. The separation of writing and thinking skills enabled by chatGPT can be leveraged for higher-order tasks and the education of discerning citizens.

The use of chatGPT and other automated writing tools has raised concerns about cheating in academia. These tools raise ethical questions about the role of human effort and learning in academic work. We propose the reintroduction of Blue Books as a solution to this debate.

Blue Books, traditionally used for handwritten exams, can also be employed for assignments requiring critical thinking and writing skills. The act of handwriting has been shown to enhance learning and memory, as it involves more cognitive effort and sensory engagement compared to typing. By assigning Blue Book tasks, instructors can ensure that students are truly learning and internalizing the principles of good writing, similar to how math education emphasizes the understanding of core principles before introducing calculators.

The use of chatGPT and other automated writing tools separates the skills of writing and thinking. While this may initially seem problematic, it also presents an opportunity for education. By focusing on higher-order tasks such as critical thinking and analysis, instructors can spend more time educating students to be discerning citizens. The use of chatGPT and other writing tools can then be leveraged for tasks requiring efficient production of written work, allowing for a more efficient and effective use of classroom time.

In conclusion, the reintroduction of Blue Books offers a solution to the chatGPT cheating debate by emphasizing the importance of human effort and learning in academic work. By assigning Blue Book tasks, instructors can ensure that students are truly internalizing the principles of good writing. At the same time, the separation of writing and thinking skills enabled by chatGPT can be leveraged for higher-order tasks and the education of discerning citizens.

Learn more about Pressto AI

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *